The Democratic Committee of

Lower Merion and Narberth

Site Links
Off Site Links
 

Summit II

 

 

Major Themes from Summit on Economics, Foreign, and Domestic Policies

 

Lower Merion/Narberth Democratic Committee Summit

April 6, 2003

 

I. Economics:

  • Expand Middle Class-Bedrock value of the Democratic Party is that government should be used to bring more and more people into the mainstream of the American Life, based on premise that “American Dream” of decent economic security and expanding opportunities for a fulfilling life.

    • Expand Middle Class—Factual information about who now constitutes Middle Class, what happened to lessen the numbers, and how numbers can be increased

    • Invest in Infrastructure, e.g., transportation system

    • Invest in Education—build job skills and improve  technological capacity of the nation

    • Fiscal Policy:  Tax Cuts/Deficits

    • Opposition to Bush fiscal policy (phased in tax cuts for wealthy, elimination of tax on dividends). Agreed hat if such tax cuts necessary (not all agree), Democrats should insist that they be:

      • Targeted – Expansion of Middle Class, jobs, infrastructure

      • Deficits – Used to build assets for future, so that future generations not mortgaged with debt and no ability to pay

  • Build Trust in Government—“The Government is you.” Republic Framing Demonizes Government – counter “sound bites,” developing language to drive home to voters:

    • In US, most government local—it is at local levels that decisions made and citizens can have impact

    • Local services must be adequately funded-“Starving government (resulting from tax reduction approach) means starving democracy itself”

  • Promote platform that is credibly pro-Business and pro-Economic Growth—1990’s policies of deregulation and the casino atmosphere surrounding US capital markets encouraged growth of huge amounts of money wasted on unproductive investment (e.g., fiber-optic lines that no one will use) and excessive executive compensation. Democrats should stress virtues of “honest” corporate practices and credibility and fairness in national economic and international policy.

                                             

II. Foreign Policy:

  • Support for multi-lateralism

    • with consideration of the US position on the international criminal court

    • reconvening of Kyoto meeting for further Treaty negotiations

  • Pre-emption—Qualified approval offered for pre-emption as appropriate strategic US doctrine. Serious and convincing evidence of strategic danger to US interests must be adduced before re-emption invoked

  • UN—Continue US participation

    • Seek reform and restructure UN administration

    • Not give UN a veto over US security concerns

  • NATO -- Continuation in but role or mission requires examination

  • China – Encourage constructive economic trade to more strongly engage China and tie       China into greater support for international institutions

  • Russia -- Because of strains over US position against Iraq (then, pre-war), strengthen relationship with Russia

  • North Korea -- Oppose a military solution to then current nuclear crisis, increased diplomacy to diffuse crisis

  • Saudi Arabia – Make serious efforts to end Saudi Arabia’s ongoing Funding of Wahabi fundamentalist schools around Arab and Islamic world; schools tied to terrorism

 III. Domestic Issues:

  •  Basic Position: Local level of service must be addressed. Community-based, family oriented approach to meeting needs and encouraging initiatives from local leadership is best for US. Community clusters, a “one stop shopping” model that provides service from local vendors to local population is viable model. Trained and “re-trained” local workers who can help with needed services is important,  e.g., training residents having lower levels of education and/or needing to “retread” in areas of important for sustainability of the community, e.g., healthcare, education, food production and distribution. Social service needs are intertwined and must be considered as an aggregate. Federation and state funding to build and sustain local initiatives is essential.

  • Healthcare

    • Basic quality health care available to all

    • Prevention via long-term initiatives, not profit but needs based

    • Finding balance in two tiered system, one based on universal coverage; the other, for those seeking care outside the system

    • Questioning equitable reimbursement, considering patients’ needs and providers’ years of training and experience

    • Questioning what is quality care?

      • What is defined as healthcare? What is quality healthcare?

      • How to handle rationing of care?

      • What is for profit healthcare and how does that breakout in cost?

    • Importance of integrating parts of healthcare now treated separately

      • Integrate care of mind with care of body           

      • Look at family needs, rather than separating out needs of children, needs of women, needs of elderly

      • Parity for mental health care and developmental disabilities essential

    • Interface of healthcare with education—an educated public is healthier

  • Education

    • No Child Left Behind is flawed policy

      • Testing in the schools to assess academic accomplishment is simply stressing test-taking.  How best to evaluate learning in schools must be studied. Different communities may benefit from different approaches; teachers also may have different styles and these may match best with certain learning styles

      • Educational success is tied to larger issues in community, such as education of parents, financial and social/emotional support for families

    • The concept of inclusion needs reevaluation and continuing revision

    • There is need to re-think goals of teaching

      • What are desired outcomes? In elementary, middle, and high school?

      • What are the expectations for US children when they graduate from high school? Is college a realistic and necessary experience for everyone? Are the needs of society and job opportunity undermined by focusing on college education as the most important outcome for high school graduates?

      • How does secondary education link to training programs?

    • How do we get quality educators?

    • How do we achieve equitable funding for school systems?

    • Recommendations:

      • Equitable funding for schools

      • Find better ways to evaluate schools without scapegoating administrators, teachers, or students

      • Reassess goals of education and expectations of teachers

Julie Levitt and Rick Pasquier, Chair, Summits

 

 

 

Democratic Committee of Lower Merion and Narberth

P.O. Box 522

Haverford, PA 19041